Our question this week comes from Bill from Bakersfield. He asks:
"I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on the U.S. supporting Ukraine."
Thank you for your question, Bill.
I know people have differing views on the extent and duration of U.S. assistance to Ukraine. It’s my belief that supporting Ukraine’s military capabilities now prevents American troops from being involved later. If Putin wins in Ukraine, it is unlikely he stops there. Countries like Moldova and Georgia could be invaded next, and if Russia invaded a NATO ally such as Poland or Romania, the United States would be legally obligated to defend those countries under Article 5 of the NATO Treaty. This is a scenario we should avoid, and one of the ways to do that is to take preventative action by continuing to support Ukraine’s efforts now.
Sending U.S. dollars and military equipment now is the best way to prevent a larger war involving American troops on the ground.
While I continue to support sending the necessary military assistance to Ukraine, it’s also important that there is proper oversight of these dollars. The NDAA, which passed the House this week, establishes a new Special Inspector General for Ukraine Security Assistance to conduct oversight and audits of all aid provided to Ukraine by the United States.